Coffee v. State
216 S.W. 1117, 1919 WL 109
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of theft; his punishment being assessed at two years in the penitentiary. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. Without these there is no question presented that can be revised. The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coffee v. State, 216 S.W. 1117, 1919 WL 109 (Tex. 1919).
216 S.W. 1117 (Coffee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.