Coffee v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

76 Miss. 569
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 Miss. 569 (Coffee v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coffee v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad, 76 Miss. 569 (Mich. 1898).

Opinion

Whitfield, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The case should have gone to the jury. A rule that baggage shall not be checked until a ticket has been procured is a reasonable regulation to prevent imposition upon the company. But a rule that a baggage master shall not receive into the baggage room baggage until a ticket shall have been procured, if there be such a rule, is an imposition upon the public, unreasonable and void. It would require intending passengers to care for their own baggage in many situations that may readily be imagined where to do so would be entirely impracticable. Every reasonable facility for travel should be afforded those who are intending passengers, and rules should be so framed as to be just in their provisions alike to the company and the traveling public. As to the authority of the baggage master, see Isaacson v. Railroad Co., 94 N. Y., 285, 286.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cone v. Southern Ry.
67 S.E. 779 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1910)
Hart v. Atlanta Terminal Co.
58 S.E. 452 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Miss. 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffee-v-louisville-nashville-railroad-miss-1898.