COFFEE, JUSTIN v. TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

COFFEE, JUSTIN v. TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 2017

DocketCA 16-01777

StatusPublished

This text of COFFEE, JUSTIN v. TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. (COFFEE, JUSTIN v. TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

COFFEE, JUSTIN v. TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

593 CA 16-01777 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

JUSTIN COFFEE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC., AND WORLDWIDE INDUSTRIES CORP., DEFENDANTS. ---------------------------------------------- WORLDWIDE INDUSTRIES CORP., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

V

CDK INDUSTRIES, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

STANLEY LAW OFFICES, SYRACUSE (STEPHANIE VISCELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (BRADY O’MALLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered April 26, 2016. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to compel disclosure and granted the cross motion of third-party defendant for a protective order.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: May 5, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI