Coffee Beanery, Ltd. v. Albert
723 N.W.2d 893, 477 Mich. 944
This text of 723 N.W.2d 893 (Coffee Beanery, Ltd. v. Albert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coffee Beanery, Ltd. v. Albert, 723 N.W.2d 893, 477 Mich. 944 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
COFFEE BEANERY, LTD., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
William ALBERT, Michael Yurick, and Hartland Coffee Beanery, LLC, d/b/a Coffee Beanery, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, and
Kevin Shaw, Third-Party Plaintiff/Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Geer v. NIKOLIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
723 N.W.2d 893 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
723 N.W.2d 893, 477 Mich. 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffee-beanery-ltd-v-albert-mich-2006.