Coffed v. McCarthy

New York Court of Appeals

Coffed v. McCarthy

74 N.E.3d 671, 29 N.Y.3d 978

DecidedMay 2, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 74 N.E.3d 671 (Coffed v. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coffed v. McCarthy, 74 N.E.3d 671, 29 N.Y.3d 978 (N.Y. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. The record discloses triable issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Garcia and Wilson concur; Judge Fahey taking no part.

Order reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. The record discloses triable issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Garcia and Wilson concur; Judge Fahey taking no part.

Order reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied, in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 N.E.3d 671, 29 N.Y.3d 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coffed-v-mccarthy-ny-2017.