Cofer v. Turman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cofer v. Turman

258 S.E.2d 922, 151 Ga. App. 72, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2429

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 4, 1979

Docket57615

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 258 S.E.2d 922 (Cofer v. Turman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cofer v. Turman, 258 S.E.2d 922, 151 Ga. App. 72, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2429 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

Appellant Cofer complains of the trial court’s exclusion of certain documentary evidence. However, the proffered evidence has not been made part of the record, and we therefore have nothing to review. "A basic rule of appellate procedure is that no appellate court can rule on [73]*73the exclusion of evidence unless it is aware of what was excluded.” 11 EGL 304, Evidence, § 10 (Civil) (1979 Rev.); Wood v. Hamilton, 109 Ga. App. 608 (5) (137 SE2d 61) (1964).

Argued April 4, 1979 Decided September 4, 1979. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Russell N. Sewell, Jr., Daryl A. Robinson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant. William R. Parker, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI