Cofer v. State
129 S.E. 110, 34 Ga. App. 220, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 160
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of violating the labor-contract law. The evidence did not authorize his conviction, and for this reason the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cofer v. State, 129 S.E. 110, 34 Ga. App. 220, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 160 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
129 S.E. 110 (Cofer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Banton v. State
194 S.E. 827 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)