Cofer v. State

129 S.E. 110, 34 Ga. App. 220, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 160
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 1925
Docket16533
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 129 S.E. 110 (Cofer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cofer v. State, 129 S.E. 110, 34 Ga. App. 220, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 160 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the labor-contract law. The evidence did not authorize his conviction, and for this reason the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banton v. State
194 S.E. 827 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 110, 34 Ga. App. 220, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cofer-v-state-gactapp-1925.