Cofer v. State
This text of 96 S.E.2d 601 (Cofer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. Her motion for new trial was denied, and she excepts. Held:
1. The general grounds were expressly abandoned.
2. The only special ground of the motion for new trial excepts to ' the failure of the trial court, without request, to charge the law of involuntary manslaughter. It is not contended that there was any evidence introduced upon the trial which required a charge on involuntary manslaughter; but it is con *23 tended that the issue was raised by the defendant’s statement to the jury. “Where there is nothing in the evidence to indicate that the killing was not voluntary, and where no charge is requested on that subject, involuntary manslaughter is not an issue in the case, and no allusion should be made to it in charging the jury, even though the prisoner’s statement by indirection suggest such a theory.” Jackson v. State, 91 Ga. 271 (3) (18 S. E. 298, 44 Am. St. R. 22); Hill v. State, 169 Ga. 455 (5) (150 S. E. 587); Reed v. State, 148 Ga. 18 (4) (95 S. E. 692); Thornton v. State, 107 Ga. 683 (6) (33 S. E. 673). The special ground is without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 S.E.2d 601, 213 Ga. 22, 1957 Ga. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cofer-v-state-ga-1957.