Cofer v. Cook

234 S.E.2d 185, 141 Ga. App. 646, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2032
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 18, 1977
Docket53558
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 234 S.E.2d 185 (Cofer v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cofer v. Cook, 234 S.E.2d 185, 141 Ga. App. 646, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2032 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. The uniform citation form shows the appellee was charged and convicted of driving under the influence *647 "City Code Sec. 15-78” on January 9,1976. The problem is that on this date there was no "City Code Sec. 15-78”; this ordinance had been repealed by the City of College Park on October 6, 1975, by Ordinance 75-27, adopting Title 68A of the Code as the valid traffic ordinances for the municipality. Even prior to its repeal, "City Code Sec. 15-78” could not have been enforced by the City of College Park. Code Ann. § 68A-1501.

The trial judge’s finding that the appellee’s conviction "is void on its face and of no force and effect” is correct. That conviction shows on its face a conviction under a repealed and otherwise unenforceable ordinance.

2. The appellant urges that having paid his fine after pleading guilty to the charge of driving under the influence, the appellee may not collaterally attack his conviction in DeKalb Superior Court and that the suspension of the license is therefore automatic. The conviction which is the predicate to the suspension is void on its face and a mere nullity and may be attacked. Code Ann. § 81A-160 (a); "and the revocation of a driver’s license based upon such conviction, being at most merely additional punishment based upon the prior conviction, is also void and a mere nullity...” Wallace v. State, 112 Ga. App. 505, 506 (145 SE2d 788). The trial judge’s order reversing the suspension of the appellee’s license was proper.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, J., concurs. Webb, J., concurs in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Earp v. Fletcher
359 S.E.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Hardison v. Martin
334 S.E.2d 161 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1985)
Cottongim v. City of East Point
306 S.E.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
State v. Kamalski
429 A.2d 1315 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1981)
Hardison v. Shepard
269 S.E.2d 458 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 S.E.2d 185, 141 Ga. App. 646, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cofer-v-cook-gactapp-1977.