Coenett v. Fulfeb

26 N.M. 175
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided December 4, 1919·No. No. 2384·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT.

PABltEB, C. J.

The record in this case does not contain either a final judgment or an interlocutory judgment, order, or decision practically disposing of the merits of the case. The record does contain a memorandum opinion of the trial court upon a proposition of law, but nothing else in the nature of a judgment. -The memorandum opinion recites that an order may be prepared in accordance therewith; but, if any order or judgment was prepared, it was omitted from the record on this appeal.

Appeals are allowed in all civil actions from final' judgments, and from such interlocutory judgments, orders, and decisions as practically dispose of the merits of the action. Sections 1 and 2, chapter 43, Laws 1917. As there is no judgment, order, or decision, final or interlocutory, contained in the record, the motion of ap-pellee to dismiss the appeal is granted; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coenett v. Fulfeb, 26 N.M. 175 (N.M. 1919).

26 N.M. 175 (Coenett v. Fulfeb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DiIaconi v. New Cal Corp.
643 P.2d 1234 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1982)