Coenett v. Fulfeb

26 N.M. 175
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 4, 1919
DocketNo. 2384
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 26 N.M. 175 (Coenett v. Fulfeb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coenett v. Fulfeb, 26 N.M. 175 (N.M. 1919).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT.

PABltEB, C. J.

The record in this case does not contain either a final judgment or an interlocutory judgment, order, or decision practically disposing of the merits of the case. The record does contain a memorandum opinion of the trial court upon a proposition of law, but nothing else in the nature of a judgment. -The memorandum opinion recites that an order may be prepared in accordance therewith; but, if any order or judgment was prepared, it was omitted from the record on this appeal.

Appeals are allowed in all civil actions from final' judgments, and from such interlocutory judgments, orders, and decisions as practically dispose of the merits of the action. Sections 1 and 2, chapter 43, Laws 1917. As there is no judgment, order, or decision, final or interlocutory, contained in the record, the motion of ap-pellee to dismiss the appeal is granted; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DiIaconi v. New Cal Corp.
643 P.2d 1234 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 N.M. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coenett-v-fulfeb-nm-1919.