Coe v. State

113 Ala. 664
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of trespass after warning. Upon the introduction of all the evidence, the court, at the request of the solicitor, instructed the jury as follows : “If the jury believe the evidence, they will find the defendant guilty.” To the giving of this charge the defendant duly excepted. The judgment of the lower court was reversed and the cause remanded on the authority of Shields v. State, 104 Ala. 35; Rhea v. State, 100 Ala. 119; Pierson v. State, 99 Ala. 148; Heath v. State, Ib. 179; Whitaker v. State, 106 Ala. 30.

Opinion by

Brickell, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coe v. State, 113 Ala. 664 (Ala. 1896).

113 Ala. 664 (Coe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cobb v. State
100 So. 463 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Kennedy v. State
70 So. 957 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)