Coe v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Coe v. State

113 Ala. 664

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 15, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 Ala. 664 (Coe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coe v. State, 113 Ala. 664 (Ala. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of trespass after warning. Upon the introduction of all the evidence, the court, at the request of the solicitor, instructed the jury as follows : “If the jury believe the evidence, they will find the defendant guilty.” To the giving of this charge the defendant duly excepted. The judgment of the lower court was reversed and the cause remanded on the authority of Shields v. State, 104 Ala. 35; Rhea v. State, 100 Ala. 119; Pierson v. State, 99 Ala. 148; Heath v. State, Ib. 179; Whitaker v. State, 106 Ala. 30.

Opinion by

Brickell, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of trespass after warning. Upon the introduction of all the evidence, the court, at the request of the solicitor, instructed the jury as follows : “If the jury believe the evidence, they will find the defendant guilty.” To the giving of this charge the defendant duly excepted. The judgment of the lower court was reversed and the cause remanded on the authority of Shields v. State, 104 Ala. 35; Rhea v. State, 100 Ala. 119; Pierson v. State, 99 Ala. 148; Heath v. State, Ib. 179; Whitaker v. State, 106 Ala. 30.

Opinion by

Brickell, C. J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 Ala. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coe-v-state-ala-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack