Coe v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad
23 N.Y.S. 1150, 67 Hun 651, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 651, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 942
This text of 23 N.Y.S. 1150 (Coe v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coe v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad, 23 N.Y.S. 1150, 67 Hun 651, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 651, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 942 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
No opinion. Judgment reversed on the exceptions, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that the evidence presented questions of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 N.Y.S. 1150, 67 Hun 651, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 651, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coe-v-rome-watertown-ogdensburg-railroad-nysupct-1893.