Coe v. Raymond
29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 461
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed. Held (1), that the answer does not set up a want of jurisdiction in the County Court. (Dake v. Miller, 15 Hun, 556, followed.) (2) The question of Phillips’ .agency was properly submitted to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coe v. Raymond, 29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 461 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).
29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 461 (Coe v. Raymond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.