Coe v. Florida Four Seasons

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coe v. Florida Four Seasons

677 So. 2d 57, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7812, 1996 WL 387766

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 12, 1996

DocketNo. 94-3714

StatusPublished

This text of 677 So. 2d 57 (Coe v. Florida Four Seasons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coe v. Florida Four Seasons, 677 So. 2d 57, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7812, 1996 WL 387766 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s claim for an increased rate of pay for her attendant care providers is affirmed as to her daughter Teresa Taylor, niece Peggy Ward, and mother Mary Greer. See Boynton Landscape v. Dickinson, 670 So.2d 151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Vickers v. Unity of Lake Worth, - So.2d-, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D659 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 13, 1996); Hardrives of Delray, Inc. v. Stimely, 670 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The order is reversed, however, in regard to appellant’s son, Tim Campbell, because the October 1990 order did not contemplate attendant care services provided by an [58]*58employed son and the claim as to his services is therefore a new claim, not a modification of the 1990 order. See Boynton.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s claim for an increased rate of pay for her attendant care providers is affirmed as to her daughter Teresa Taylor, niece Peggy Ward, and mother Mary Greer. See Boynton Landscape v. Dickinson, 670 So.2d 151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Vickers v. Unity of Lake Worth, - So.2d-, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D659 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 13, 1996); Hardrives of Delray, Inc. v. Stimely, 670 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The order is reversed, however, in regard to appellant’s son, Tim Campbell, because the October 1990 order did not contemplate attendant care services provided by an [58]*58employed son and the claim as to his services is therefore a new claim, not a modification of the 1990 order. See Boynton.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 So. 2d 57, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7812, 1996 WL 387766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coe-v-florida-four-seasons-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack