Coe v. Coe
131 A. 922, 99 N.J. Eq. 422, 14 Stock. 422, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 547
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coe v. Coe, 131 A. 922, 99 N.J. Eq. 422, 14 Stock. 422, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 547 (N.J. 1926).
131 A. 922 (Coe v. Coe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martinique v. Martinique
141 A.2d 562 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)