Coe v. Coe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coe v. Coe

152 So. 2d 176, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3600

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 1963·No. No. 62-411·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the plaintiff-wife brings up for review the alimony and child support provisions of a final decree in a divorce suit. The appellee has filed a cross-assignment contending that the trial court erred in entering that part of the final decree finding that the parties held certain real estate as an estate by the entireties.

After duly considering the record, we conclude that the appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion. Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 597.

We find no merit in appellee’s cross-assignment. McFarland v. McFarland, Fla.App.1961, 131 So.2d 749.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the plaintiff-wife brings up for review the alimony and child support provisions of a final decree in a divorce suit. The appellee has filed a cross-assignment contending that the trial court erred in entering that part of the final decree finding that the parties held certain real estate as an estate by the entireties.

After duly considering the record, we conclude that the appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion. Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 597.

We find no merit in appellee’s cross-assignment. McFarland v. McFarland, Fla.App.1961, 131 So.2d 749.

Affirmed.

Coe v. Coe, 152 So. 2d 176, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3600 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

152 So. 2d 176 (Coe v. Coe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related