Coe v. Coe

152 So. 2d 176, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3600
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 23, 1963
DocketNo. 62-411
StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 2d 176 (Coe v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coe v. Coe, 152 So. 2d 176, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3600 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the plaintiff-wife brings up for review the alimony and child support provisions of a final decree in a divorce suit. The appellee has filed a cross-assignment contending that the trial court erred in entering that part of the final decree finding that the parties held certain real estate as an estate by the entireties.

After duly considering the record, we conclude that the appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion. Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 597.

We find no merit in appellee’s cross-assignment. McFarland v. McFarland, Fla.App.1961, 131 So.2d 749.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Lewis
104 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
McFarland v. McFarland
131 So. 2d 749 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 So. 2d 176, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coe-v-coe-fladistctapp-1963.