Coe v. B & D Transp. Services, Inc.

561 So. 2d 469
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 25, 1990
Docket89-01829, 89-02311
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 561 So. 2d 469 (Coe v. B & D Transp. Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coe v. B & D Transp. Services, Inc., 561 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

561 So.2d 469 (1990)

Craig L. COE, Appellant,
v.
B & D TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., a Florida Corporation D/B/a Budget Car Sales of Southwest Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 89-01829, 89-02311.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 25, 1990.

*470 Andrew J. Rodnite, Jr. and Joseph R. Park of Park and Smith, P.A., Clearwater, for appellant.

Gerald W. Pierce of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellee.

THREADGILL, Judge.

Craig L. Coe (Coe), plaintiff below, appeals from a final summary judgment and order of costs and attorney's fees. We affirm the summary judgment which determined that the buyer of an automobile had equitable title when Coe, a passenger, was injured in an accident involving the automobile. The effect of the judgment was to dismiss the seller, B & D Transportation Services, Inc., a Florida corporation d/b/a Budget Car Sales of Southwest Florida (Budget) from the law suit. We also affirm the general award of costs to Budget as the prevailing party. § 57.041, Fla. Stat. (1987).

Before final summary judgment was entered, Budget served Coe with an offer of judgment. The final summary judgment was thereafter entered in favor of the defendant, Budget. There was no judgment entered in favor of Coe. The trial court then entered an order entitling Budget to attorney's fees pursuant to sections 45.061 and 768.79, Florida Statutes (1987) and reserved jurisdiction to set the amount of fees.

This court recently held in Kline v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., Nos. 89-00345 and 89-01182 (Fla. 2d DCA May 9, 1990), that before a defendant is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to an offer of judgment, there must be a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff. Because judgment was not rendered in favor of the plaintiff below, we reverse the order finding Budget entitled to attorney's fees.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brodose v. School Bd. of Pinellas County
622 So. 2d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Timmons v. Combs
608 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Elbert
590 So. 2d 15 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Protective Insurance v. Great Dane Trailers of Florida, Inc.
50 Fla. Supp. 2d 136 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1991)
Sharp Community Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Sharp
582 So. 2d 778 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Westover v. Allstate Insurance Co.
581 So. 2d 988 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Mujica v. Turner
582 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Timmons v. Combs
579 So. 2d 840 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Norris & Associates of Naples, Inc. v. Elkins
570 So. 2d 1386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 So. 2d 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coe-v-b-d-transp-services-inc-fladistctapp-1990.