Cody v. State
This text of 86 S.E. 462 (Cody v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The accused will not be heard to complain that the court, after instructing the jury that they could believe wholly or in part the defendant’s statement at the trial, failed to charge also that they might disbelieve it entirely.
2. Whether portions of the record of a former trial of another party were admissible or not, the evidence, coupled with the defendant’s statement, demanded the verdict of guilty, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 S.E. 462, 17 Ga. App. 261, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-v-state-gactapp-1915.