Cody v. Gutman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Cody v. Gutman

39 S.W. 1116, 138 Mo. 250, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 107

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 23, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion.

Peb Cubiam (Babclay. P. J., and Maceablane and Bbace, JJ.)

In this cause an appeal was taken [251] in the circuit court (and duly allowed) to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. But, by mistake or oversight, the transcript of the record was sent to the Supreme Court, and the case was filed and placed on the docket here. As this was entirely irregular, the motion of defendant, as apppellant, to transfer to the court of appeals aforesaid is granted. R. S. 1889, sec. 3300.

All the members of the first division except Judge Robinson, who is absent, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion.

Peb Cubiam (Babclay. P. J., and Maceablane and Bbace, JJ.)

In this cause an appeal was taken [251] in the circuit court (and duly allowed) to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. But, by mistake or oversight, the transcript of the record was sent to the Supreme Court, and the case was filed and placed on the docket here. As this was entirely irregular, the motion of defendant, as apppellant, to transfer to the court of appeals aforesaid is granted. R. S. 1889, sec. 3300.

All the members of the first division except Judge Robinson, who is absent, concur.

Cody v. Gutman, 39 S.W. 1116, 138 Mo. 250, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 107 (Mo. 1897).

Pincite

39 S.W. 1116 (Cody v. Gutman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related