Cody v. Gutman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Cody v. Gutman

39 S.W. 1116, 138 Mo. 250, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 107

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedMarch 23, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 S.W. 1116 (Cody v. Gutman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cody v. Gutman, 39 S.W. 1116, 138 Mo. 250, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 107 (Mo. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion.

Peb Cubiam (Babclay. P. J., and Maceablane and Bbace, JJ.)

In this cause an appeal was taken [251]*251in the circuit court (and duly allowed) to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. But, by mistake or oversight, the transcript of the record was sent to the Supreme Court, and the case was filed and placed on the docket here. As this was entirely irregular, the motion of defendant, as apppellant, to transfer to the court of appeals aforesaid is granted. R. S. 1889, sec. 3300.

All the members of the first division except Judge Robinson, who is absent, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion.

Peb Cubiam (Babclay. P. J., and Maceablane and Bbace, JJ.)

In this cause an appeal was taken [251]*251in the circuit court (and duly allowed) to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. But, by mistake or oversight, the transcript of the record was sent to the Supreme Court, and the case was filed and placed on the docket here. As this was entirely irregular, the motion of defendant, as apppellant, to transfer to the court of appeals aforesaid is granted. R. S. 1889, sec. 3300.

All the members of the first division except Judge Robinson, who is absent, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 S.W. 1116, 138 Mo. 250, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-v-gutman-mo-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack