Cody v. Gaynes

279 A.D. 910, 110 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5282
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 3, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 910 (Cody v. Gaynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cody v. Gaynes, 279 A.D. 910, 110 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

An agreement to hold plaintiffs harmless from claims constitutes a promise to indemnify against loss rather than a promise to indemnify against liability and, in the absence of an allegation of actual loss, a cause of action is insufficient. {Fredel v. Greene, 278 App. Div. 579, affd. 302 jST. Y. 859.) The third cause of action of the corporate plaintiff, is insufficient because there is no allegation that the corporate plaintiff has any interest in the bonds. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neptune-Benson, LLC v. Bio UV SAS
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2021
Madeira v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc.
323 F. App'x 89 (Second Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 910, 110 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-v-gaynes-nyappdiv-1952.