Cody v. Gaynes
This text of 279 A.D. 910 (Cody v. Gaynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An agreement to hold plaintiffs harmless from claims constitutes a promise to indemnify against loss rather than a promise to indemnify against liability and, in the absence of an allegation of actual loss, a cause of action is insufficient. {Fredel v. Greene, 278 App. Div. 579, affd. 302 jST. Y. 859.) The third cause of action of the corporate plaintiff, is insufficient because there is no allegation that the corporate plaintiff has any interest in the bonds. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 910, 110 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-v-gaynes-nyappdiv-1952.