Cody v. Gaynes
279 A.D. 910, 110 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5282
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 1952·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
An agreement to hold plaintiffs harmless from claims constitutes a promise to indemnify against loss rather than a promise to indemnify against liability and, in the absence of an allegation of actual loss, a cause of action is insufficient. {Fredel v. Greene, 278 App. Div. 579, affd. 302 jST. Y. 859.) The third cause of action of the corporate plaintiff, is insufficient because there is no allegation that the corporate plaintiff has any interest in the bonds. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cody v. Gaynes, 279 A.D. 910, 110 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 910 (Cody v. Gaynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Neptune-Benson, LLC v. Bio UV SAS
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2021
Madeira v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc.
323 F. App'x 89 (Second Circuit, 2009)