Cody v. Commercial Fire Insurance

13 Ill. App. 110, 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 21
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 27, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 Ill. App. 110 (Cody v. Commercial Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cody v. Commercial Fire Insurance, 13 Ill. App. 110, 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 21 (Ill. Ct. App. 1883).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The verdict was inconsistent and absurd. The plaintiff introduced evidence tending to support the allegations in his declaration, and the jury found the issues in his favor. By the undisputed evidence the damages proved amounted to the sum of $540. If the plaintiff was entitled to recover, the verdict should have been for r,hat sum; if he was not entitled to recover, the verdict should have been for the defendant. The record as it stands, is simply a judicial burlesque, and, if allowed to remain unreversed, would reflect unfavorably upon the administration of justice in courts of law.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Selamakos v. Victory Ice & Ice Cream Co.
246 Ill. App. 178 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)
Conrad Seipp Brewing Co. v. Peck
85 Ill. App. 637 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Ill. App. 110, 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-v-commercial-fire-insurance-illappct-1883.