Cody v. . Barrett.
This text of 156 S.E. 146 (Cody v. . Barrett.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
after stating tbe case: It is provided by 3 C. S., 5533, tbat no election of a teacher or assistant teacher by the school committee of a nonlocal tax district shall be deemed valid until such election has been approved by the county superintendent, the executive officer of the county school system. 3 C. S., 5389; Spruill v. Davenport, 178 N. C., 364, 100 S. E., 527.
We have discovered no sufficient evidence on the present record to warrant the finding that the respondent acted “arbitrarily, captiously and without just cause.” Hence, the application for writ of mandamus should have been denied. Hayes v. Benton, 193 N. C., 379, 137 S. E., 169. Mandamus lies only to enforce a clear legal right. Umstead v. Board of Elections, 192 N. C., 139, 134 S. E., 409; Person v. Doughton, 186 N. C., 723, 120 S. E., 481.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 S.E. 146, 200 N.C. 43, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-v-barrett-nc-1930.