Cody Ray Vaughan v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 11, 2025
Docket10-25-00278-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Cody Ray Vaughan v. the State of Texas (Cody Ray Vaughan v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cody Ray Vaughan v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas

10-25-00277-CR 10-25-00278-CR

Cody Ray Vaughan, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

On appeal from the 52nd District Court of Coryell County, Texas Judge Trent D. Farrell, presiding Trial Court Cause Nos. 24-28962 and 24-28963

JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Cody Ray Vaughan appeals from two convictions for which sentence was

imposed on July 18, 2025. Vaughan filed a pro se notice of appeal in each case

dated August 19, 2025. By letter dated August 20, 2025, the Clerk of this Court

informed Vaughan that his appeals were untimely and would be dismissed if

a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals was not filed on or

before September 2, 2025. No response has been filed. Additionally, the certifications of the defendant’s right to appeal signed

by the trial court, Vaughan, and his trial counsel on July 18, 2025, state that

this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal;” and

“the defendant has waived the right of appeal.”

The trial court must file a certification of the defendant's right of appeal,

and unless "a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal

has . . . been made part of the record," we "must" dismiss the appeal. TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). Because the trial court’s certifications of the defendant’s

right of appeal indicate that Vaughan does not have the right to appeal from a

plea-bargain case and has waived the right to appeal in both cases, these

appeals must be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Monreal v. State, 99

S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).

Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.

LEE HARRIS Justice

OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: September 11, 2025 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Appeals dismissed Do not publish CRPM

Vaughan v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Monreal v. State
99 S.W.3d 615 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cody Ray Vaughan v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-ray-vaughan-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.