Cody Lee Cochran v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
DecidedApril 28, 2026
Docket07-25-00301-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Cody Lee Cochran v. the State of Texas (Cody Lee Cochran v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cody Lee Cochran v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-25-00298-CR No. 07-25-00299-CR No. 07-25-00300-CR No. 07-25-00301-CR No. 07-25-00302-CR

CODY LEE COCHRAN, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 223rd District Court Gray County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 11985, 11986, 11987, 11988, & 12811 Honorable Phil N. Vanderpool, Presiding

April 28, 2026 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before DOSS and YARBROUGH and PRATT, JJ.

Appellant, Cody Lee Cochran, appeals from two convictions for continuous sexual

abuse of a child,1 two convictions for prohibited sexual conduct,2 and one conviction for

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 21.02(b).

2 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 25.02. possession of child pornography.3 The trial court sentenced Appellant to ninety-nine

years of confinement for each continuous sexual abuse conviction and ten years of

confinement for each of the remaining convictions. The clerk’s record and reporter’s

record have been filed. However, the reporter’s record does not include State’s Exhibits

22, 23, and 24. The court reporter has advised this Court that these exhibits are

encrypted by the FBI and cannot be accessed or reviewed without FBI encryption

software. They are presently maintained on file with the district clerk.

Because the appellate record is incomplete in a manner that prevents meaningful

review, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall require the State to provide accessible,

reviewable copies of State’s Exhibits 22, 23, and 24, that can be transmitted to and

examined by this Court and Appellant without the need for FBI Encryption Software. The

trial court shall further direct the court reporter to file the accessible exhibits with the Clerk

of this Court by May 28, 2026.

If the State is unable to provide the de-encrypted exhibits or otherwise accessible

versions of the exhibits, the trial court shall conduct a hearing in accordance with Rule of

Appellate Procedure 34.6(f) to determine whether the exhibits are functionally lost or

destroyed. See Herrera v. State, No. 13-22-00352-CR, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 2857, at

*13–14 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Apr. 25, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op.) (doing same);

Mendoza v. State, No. 07-14-00034-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6485, at *2–3 (Tex.

App.—Amarillo June 16, 2014, no pet.) (per curiam) (remanding appeal for findings

3 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 43.26(d).

2 pursuant to Rule 34.6(f)). Following such a hearing, the trial court shall enter findings of

fact on the aforementioned matters and include its findings in a supplemental record to

be filed with this Court by May 28, 2026.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cody Lee Cochran v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-lee-cochran-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp7-2026.