Cody Lee Cochran v. the State of Texas
This text of Cody Lee Cochran v. the State of Texas (Cody Lee Cochran v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00298-CR No. 07-25-00299-CR No. 07-25-00300-CR No. 07-25-00301-CR No. 07-25-00302-CR
CODY LEE COCHRAN, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 223rd District Court Gray County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 11985, 11986, 11987, 11988, & 12811 Honorable Phil N. Vanderpool, Presiding
April 28, 2026 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before DOSS and YARBROUGH and PRATT, JJ.
Appellant, Cody Lee Cochran, appeals from two convictions for continuous sexual
abuse of a child,1 two convictions for prohibited sexual conduct,2 and one conviction for
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 21.02(b).
2 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 25.02. possession of child pornography.3 The trial court sentenced Appellant to ninety-nine
years of confinement for each continuous sexual abuse conviction and ten years of
confinement for each of the remaining convictions. The clerk’s record and reporter’s
record have been filed. However, the reporter’s record does not include State’s Exhibits
22, 23, and 24. The court reporter has advised this Court that these exhibits are
encrypted by the FBI and cannot be accessed or reviewed without FBI encryption
software. They are presently maintained on file with the district clerk.
Because the appellate record is incomplete in a manner that prevents meaningful
review, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall require the State to provide accessible,
reviewable copies of State’s Exhibits 22, 23, and 24, that can be transmitted to and
examined by this Court and Appellant without the need for FBI Encryption Software. The
trial court shall further direct the court reporter to file the accessible exhibits with the Clerk
of this Court by May 28, 2026.
If the State is unable to provide the de-encrypted exhibits or otherwise accessible
versions of the exhibits, the trial court shall conduct a hearing in accordance with Rule of
Appellate Procedure 34.6(f) to determine whether the exhibits are functionally lost or
destroyed. See Herrera v. State, No. 13-22-00352-CR, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 2857, at
*13–14 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Apr. 25, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op.) (doing same);
Mendoza v. State, No. 07-14-00034-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6485, at *2–3 (Tex.
App.—Amarillo June 16, 2014, no pet.) (per curiam) (remanding appeal for findings
3 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 43.26(d).
2 pursuant to Rule 34.6(f)). Following such a hearing, the trial court shall enter findings of
fact on the aforementioned matters and include its findings in a supplemental record to
be filed with this Court by May 28, 2026.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cody Lee Cochran v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-lee-cochran-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp7-2026.