Cody John Hicks v. State
This text of Cody John Hicks v. State (Cody John Hicks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00525-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
CODY JOHN HICKS, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Victoria County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Order Per Curiam
Appellant’s brief was originally due on November 21, 2014. Counsel filed a
motion for extension of time until February 16, 2015, which was granted by the Court.
On February 20, 2015, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant’s counsel that the brief
had not been filed and requested a response concerning the failure to file the brief within ten days. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file either a response or an appellate brief
in this matter.
Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court
for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make
appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether
appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a
brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant
has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should
be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.
If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that
present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to
court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant
in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email
address, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing
counsel.
The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any
orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental
clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record
of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental
reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the
expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
2 It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered and filed the 16th day of March, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cody John Hicks v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-john-hicks-v-state-texapp-2015.