Cody Allan Srader v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 6, 2016
Docket05-15-01272-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Cody Allan Srader v. State (Cody Allan Srader v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cody Allan Srader v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order entered September 6, 2016

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01272-CR

CODY ALLAN SRADER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-80009-2015

ORDER The Court has before it appellant Cody Allan Srader’s August 31, 2016, “Motion to

Present Pro Se Supplemental Appeal Brief.” Appellant, who is represented by counsel, is not

entitled to hybrid representation. See Scheanette v. State, 144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n.2 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2004). Accordingly, we DENY Srader’s pro se motion.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scheanette v. State
144 S.W.3d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cody Allan Srader v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-allan-srader-v-state-texapp-2016.