Codwise v. Gleason
This text of 3 Day 12 (Codwise v. Gleason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
directed the jury, that as to the first point, though he had had doubts, they were almost entirely removed. If anote were forged, the endorsement would bind the man who made it .
[16]*16The second point he declared not to have altered the decision of the case from what it would havebeen, if the were the only endorsees^ and the defendants the only persons through whose hands the note had passed, Gleason 1st Cowles gave the weight of their names to the world, and must be responsible to every man who trusts to the note relying on their credit, as every subsequent endorsee must be supposed to do, from the nature of the transaction. The case is, therefore, clearly frith the plaintiffs on both points. .
A verdict was accordingly found for plaintiffs to recover 1,599 dollars and 20 cents damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Day 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/codwise-v-gleason-circtdct-1808.