Codwise v. Field
9 Johns. 263
Opinion
There was no payment or satisfaction of the iirst execution. Admitting that the coroner was authorized to receive the debt in money, as we think he was; yet it must be an actual and absolute payment in cash to him for the plaintiff The motion must be denied.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Codwise v. Field, 9 Johns. 263 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1812).
9 Johns. 263 (Codwise v. Field) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bowe v. Campbell
63 How. Pr. 167 (New York Supreme Court, 1882)
Whiting v. Beebe
7 Ark. 421 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1851)
Hood v. Moore
9 Ill. 99 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1847)
Williams v. Charles
7 Ala. 202 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1844)
Planters' Bank v. Scott
5 Miss. 246 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1840)
Griswold v. Hill
11 F. Cas. 63 (U.S. Circuit Court for New York, 1825)
Bank of Orange County v. Wakeman
1 Cow. 46 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)
Langdon v. Hathaway
1 N.H. 367 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1819)