Codwife, Ludlow & Co. v. Hacker

New York Supreme Court

Codwife, Ludlow & Co. v. Hacker

1 Cai. Cas. 74

DecidedMay 15, 1803

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 74 (Codwife, Ludlow & Co. v. Hacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Codwife, Ludlow & Co. v. Hacker, 1 Cai. Cas. 74 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

We confider that the plaintiff was irregular, in not anfwering when applied to, whether he would receive amendments or not.

N. B. It was faid by the court, that where a defendant, after verdiét, makes a cafe and notices for argument, if he does not appear at the time when called, judgment ihall go but when the plaintiff notices a cafe made on the part of the defendant, and the plaintiff is not ready, it ihall go down.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

We confider that the plaintiff was irregular, in not anfwering when applied to, whether he would receive amendments or not.

N. B. It was faid by the court, that where a defendant, after verdiét, makes a cafe and notices for argument, if he does not appear at the time when called, judgment ihall go but when the plaintiff notices a cafe made on the part of the defendant, and the plaintiff is not ready, it ihall go down.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cai. Cas. 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/codwife-ludlow-co-v-hacker-nysupct-1803.