Coder v. O'Brien

405 F. App'x 778
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 2010
DocketNo. 10-7140
StatusPublished

This text of 405 F. App'x 778 (Coder v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coder v. O'Brien, 405 F. App'x 778 (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas W. Coder appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coder v. O’Brien, 719 F.Supp.2d 655 (W.D.Va.2010). We deny Coder’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coder v. O'BRIEN
719 F. Supp. 2d 655 (W.D. Virginia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
405 F. App'x 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coder-v-obrien-ca4-2010.