Codella v. Murray
This text of 1 A.D.2d 893 (Codella v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal from so much of an interlocutory judgment as (1) reforms a written contract entered into with respondent, as an employee, so as to have the contract recite that appellant, and not the defendant, was the contracting employer; (2) directs appellant to account to respondent for profits to which he is entitled under said agreement; and (3) refers the matter of taking and stating the account to a referee. Interlocutory judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 893, 150 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/codella-v-murray-nyappdiv-1956.