Coddington v. Crosson

183 A.D.2d 428
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.), entered April 12, 1991, which granted respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the petition, without prejudice to the institution of a new proceeding upon petitioners exhausting their administrative remedies, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioners, Secretaries to Judges (JG-14) employed in the Nassau County District Court, were not directly affected by the Chief Administrative Judge’s reclassification of secretaries in the Family, County and Surrogate’s Courts mandated in Matter of Bellacosa v Classification Review Bd. (72 NY2d 383), and thus there is no basis for their argument that it would be futile for them to seek reclassification through administrative channels. Concur — Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coddington v. Crosson, 183 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

183 A.D.2d 428 (Coddington v. Crosson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Neill v. Pfau
31 Misc. 3d 184 (New York Supreme Court, 2011)