Coddington v. Comstock

New York Court of Chancery

Coddington v. Comstock

11 Paige Ch. 235, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 218

DecidedOctober 4, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Paige Ch. 235 (Coddington v. Comstock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coddington v. Comstock, 11 Paige Ch. 235, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 218 (N.Y. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor

decided that the defendants who had not appeared in the cause, were only entitled to the usual time, upon a service through the post office under the provisions of the 191st rule, He said the 14th and 15th rules, which required double the usual time, where the service was upon an agent or by putting into the post office, only applied to services upon solicitors who had appeared in the cause. But that those rules were not applicable to services upon parties who had not entered their appearance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor

decided that the defendants who had not appeared in the cause, were only entitled to the usual time, upon a service through the post office under the provisions of the 191st rule, He said the 14th and 15th rules, which required double the usual time, where the service was upon an agent or by putting into the post office, only applied to services upon solicitors who had appeared in the cause. But that those rules were not applicable to services upon parties who had not entered their appearance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Paige Ch. 235, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coddington-v-comstock-nychanct-1844.