Cocoa-Rockledge Drainage Dist. v. Vans Agnew

Supreme Court of Florida

Cocoa-Rockledge Drainage Dist. v. Vans Agnew

149 So. 577, 111 Fla. 575

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 12, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 So. 577 (Cocoa-Rockledge Drainage Dist. v. Vans Agnew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cocoa-Rockledge Drainage Dist. v. Vans Agnew, 149 So. 577, 111 Fla. 575 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinions

A motion to strike the bill of exceptions in this cause was granted. It was predicated on Myrick v. Merritt, 21 Fla. 799, and Peace Creek Drainage District v. Turner, 97 Fla. 486, 121 So.2d 469. In these cases we held that a bill of exceptions is without effect, when it was made up and presented after expiration of time allowed in order made during term of court at which motion for new trial was made and denied, since order of court made after adjournment of court extending time in which to make up bill of exceptions was unauthorized.

A means of overcoming the defect in the bill of exceptions as pointed out in these opinions was provided by Section 2917, Revised General Statutes of 1920, Section 4634, Compiled General Laws of 1927, if the bill of exceptions was actually made up and duly authenticated according to law and is incorporated in the transcript of the record.

We are now requested to reconsider our order made granting the motion to strike the bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions was actually made up and included in the transcript of the record, but it was not authenticated as the law directs. Section 2917, Revised General Statutes, supra, cannot be construed to relieve it of this vice. For this reason it cannot be considered. See Maul Ojus Rock Co. v. Lumpkin, 107 Fla. 263,144 So.2d 405.

The motion to reconsider is accordingly denied.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A motion to strike the bill of exceptions in this cause was granted. It was predicated on Myrick v. Merritt, 21 Fla. 799, and Peace Creek Drainage District v. Turner, 97 Fla. 486, 121 So.2d 469. In these cases we held that a bill of exceptions is without effect, when it was made up and presented after expiration of time allowed in order made during term of court at which motion for new trial was made and denied, since order of court made after adjournment of court extending time in which to make up bill of exceptions was unauthorized.

A means of overcoming the defect in the bill of exceptions as pointed out in these opinions was provided by Section 2917, Revised General Statutes of 1920, Section 4634, Compiled General Laws of 1927, if the bill of exceptions was actually made up and duly authenticated according to law and is incorporated in the transcript of the record.

We are now requested to reconsider our order made granting the motion to strike the bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions was actually made up and included in the transcript of the record, but it was not authenticated as the law directs. Section 2917, Revised General Statutes, supra, cannot be construed to relieve it of this vice. For this reason it cannot be considered. See Maul Ojus Rock Co. v. Lumpkin, 107 Fla. 263,144 So.2d 405.

The motion to reconsider is accordingly denied.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 So. 577, 111 Fla. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cocoa-rockledge-drainage-dist-v-vans-agnew-fla-1934.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack