Cocoa-Rockledge Drainage Dist. v. Vans Agnew
Opinions
A motion to strike the bill of exceptions in this cause was granted. It was predicated on Myrick v. Merritt,
A means of overcoming the defect in the bill of exceptions as pointed out in these opinions was provided by Section 2917, Revised General Statutes of 1920, Section 4634, Compiled General Laws of 1927, if the bill of exceptions was actually made up and duly authenticated according to law and is incorporated in the transcript of the record.
We are now requested to reconsider our order made granting the motion to strike the bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions was actually made up and included in the transcript of the record, but it was not authenticated as the law directs. Section 2917, Revised General Statutes, supra, cannot be construed to relieve it of this vice. For this reason it cannot be considered. See Maul Ojus Rock Co. v. Lumpkin,
The motion to reconsider is accordingly denied.
DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
149 So. 577 (Cocoa-Rockledge Drainage Dist. v. Vans Agnew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.