Coco v. Thienman
This text of 25 La. Ann. 236 (Coco v. Thienman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
A motion to dismiss the appeal has been made, on the following grounds : That the record is defective, a part of the evidence offered, not being in the transcript j that the sheriff,, w.ho-is a [237]*237party to the suit is not a party to this appeal; and that the sureties to the injunction bond are not made parties to the appeal as they did not sign the appeal bond.
The fact, to prove which the documents omitted were offered, is admitted in the record — there was no necessity therefore to copy them in the transcript. The appeal was taken by motion in open court at the term when the judgment was rendered. All who are not appellants .are appellees in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 La. Ann. 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coco-v-thienman-la-1873.