Cockrum v. Williamson

13 S.W. 592, 53 Ark. 131, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 47
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 12, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 S.W. 592 (Cockrum v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cockrum v. Williamson, 13 S.W. 592, 53 Ark. 131, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 47 (Ark. 1890).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

ovLeeiaopemi,g If the order of the county court open-the road was valid and binding upon the land owner,, as the plaintiff seems to concede, then the road overseer who entered upon the land, in pursuance of the order, had authority to remove the fence where it obstructed the highway, without becoming responsible for injury done to the plaintiff’s personal property by stock entering the premises.

2. Trespasson realty — Junsdicth°npeÍceU.stIce °f jf order was void the entrv of the overseer was a ' trespass on realty, and the justice had no jurisdiction to try the cause.

In neither event could the plaintiff recover.

Reverse the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Short v. Kennedy
35 S.W.2d 591 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 S.W. 592, 53 Ark. 131, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cockrum-v-williamson-ark-1890.