Cockrill v. United States Nat. Bank

82 F. 1000, 27 C.C.A. 678, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2027
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 15, 1897
DocketNo. 984
StatusPublished

This text of 82 F. 1000 (Cockrill v. United States Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cockrill v. United States Nat. Bank, 82 F. 1000, 27 C.C.A. 678, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2027 (8th Cir. 1897).

Opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas. S. R. Cockrill, for plaintiff in error. John Fletcher and W. C. Ratcliffe, for defendant in error. No opinion. Affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 F. 1000, 27 C.C.A. 678, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cockrill-v-united-states-nat-bank-ca8-1897.