Cockrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cockrell v. State

227 S.W.2d 216, 154 Tex. Crim. 290, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2030

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 22, 1950

DocketNo. 24637

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 227 S.W.2d 216 (Cockrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cockrell v. State, 227 S.W.2d 216, 154 Tex. Crim. 290, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2030 (Tex. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction was for driving a motor vehicle on a public highway in Scurry County while intoxicated. A jury found appellant guilty and assessed the punishment at a fine of $500.00.

Prosecution was by complaint and information, both of which were filed on June 11, 1949. The offense is alleged to have occurred on June 11, 1949. There is no allegation in the information that the offense was committed before the information was filed. This defect is fatal. The trial court should have sustained appellant’s motion to quash the information. See Art. 414 C. C. P., Sub. 6; Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C., Sec. 433, p. 230 and cases cited therein; Phariss v. State, 136 Tex. Cr. R. 504, 126 S. W. 2d 981; Id., 137 Tex. Crim. Rep. 98, 128 S. W. (2d) 415; Cobb v. State, 139 Tex. Cr. 337, 139 S. W. 2d 272; Hoot v. State, 149 Tex. Cr. R. 316, 194 S. W. 2d 97; Martini v. State, 150 Tex. Cr. R. 155, 205 S. W. 2d 988.

The complaint is not subject to the defect pointed out in the information. If the state so desires a new information based on the complaint could be filed. Under the record as it now appears it is imperative that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded, with the further order that the prosecution be dismissed under the present information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction was for driving a motor vehicle on a public highway in Scurry County while intoxicated. A jury found appellant guilty and assessed the punishment at a fine of $500.00.

Prosecution was by complaint and information, both of which were filed on June 11, 1949. The offense is alleged to have occurred on June 11, 1949. There is no allegation in the information that the offense was committed before the information was filed. This defect is fatal. The trial court should have sustained appellant’s motion to quash the information. See Art. 414 C. C. P., Sub. 6; Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C., Sec. 433, p. 230 and cases cited therein; Phariss v. State, 136 Tex. Cr. R. 504, 126 S. W. 2d 981; Id., 137 Tex. Crim. Rep. 98, 128 S. W. (2d) 415; Cobb v. State, 139 Tex. Cr. 337, 139 S. W. 2d 272; Hoot v. State, 149 Tex. Cr. R. 316, 194 S. W. 2d 97; Martini v. State, 150 Tex. Cr. R. 155, 205 S. W. 2d 988.

The complaint is not subject to the defect pointed out in the information. If the state so desires a new information based on the complaint could be filed. Under the record as it now appears it is imperative that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded, with the further order that the prosecution be dismissed under the present information.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 S.W.2d 216, 154 Tex. Crim. 290, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cockrell-v-state-texcrimapp-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack