Cockrell v. State
This text of 823 So. 2d 322 (Cockrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Barry Wayne COCKRELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*323 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
COVINGTON, Judge.
The appellant, Barry Wayne Cockrell, challenges an order that revokes the community control he was serving for offenses he committed in 1998 and 1999. We affirm the revocation without discussion. We, however, remand this cause for correction of the written revocation order to conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement. Specifically, the trial court announced at the close of the revocation hearing that it was revoking Cockrell's community control only upon a finding that he willfully and substantially violated community control condition ten, which prohibited him from leaving his approved residence without permission. The order inaccurately reflects that Cockrell additionally violated community control condition twenty, which required him to obtain a drug evaluation.
Affirmed, but remanded for corrections.
BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS, J., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
823 So. 2d 322, 2002 WL 1877042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cockrell-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.