Cockraft v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co.

1 La. App. 684, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 125
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 20, 1925
DocketNo. 2243
StatusPublished

This text of 1 La. App. 684 (Cockraft v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cockraft v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co., 1 La. App. 684, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 125 (La. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

STATEMENT.

Plaintiff drove or allowed- his Dodge automobile to roll in front of defendant’s incoming passenger train No. 1 and stopped when said train was only a short distance away.

As soon as the engineer in charge of the train knew or could have known of plaintiff’s peril, he applied the emergency brakes and did all else in his power to stop his train.

Defendant attempted to back his automobile from the railway track but his engine was “dead” and a collision followed.

The question to be decided is: Was the defendant guilty of negligence; if so, was plaintiff guilty of such contributory negligence as to bar him from recovering damages.

OPINION.

The only negligence of plaintiff complained of by defendant is the negligence of the flagmen in charge of the grade crossing of the railway company over .Market street in the city of Shreve_port, Louisiana.

The evidence on this point is conflicting.

Plaintiff’s evidence touching this question is as follows:

Page 5.
“Q. Just state what you did before attempting to cross at that point?
“A. I looked and everything seemed to be clear, and it was clear, and the flagman was out there with his flag in his right hand down as though everything was all right. He could see me clearly and I could see him and it was a kind of diagonal direction to him but he could see me without any trouble and I could see him without any trouble. •
Page 7.
“Q. With reference to his stop sign, state to the court just the position he had it in.
“A. In his right hand to the side as though 'everything was all right. He saw me' and I saw him and he stood there with the sign .down by his side un,til I. got right near the first track [685]*685when lie suddenly shot it up excitedly, and I stopped immediately and cast my eye to the right and there was the approaching train right on this track just where the front end of my car was' stopped, and I threw my car in reverse and released the brake and pressed on the gas hurriedly, and it seemed like death was on me and I was trying.to get out of the way and I muckled my car — it didn’t work. I lost hope of .that saving me and I threw the door open to make my escape but as I got the door open and my foot on the outside and hadn’t left the car the crash came, the locomotive hit the car and swung it around and turned it and finally it swung around and caught on the side of the engine and caught my limbs between the engine and the car.
Page 32.
“Q. You say you couldn’t see any engine approaching to the right?
“A. Couldn’t until I was right near the track.
“Q. How far from the track?
“A. Oh, just a few feet; you couldn’t see around that building.
“Q. Well, how far?
“A. You see, I was on the right hand
“Q. Wait a minute. Answer my question; how far from the first track?
“A. I reckon ten or twelve feet.
Page 38.
“Q. Don’t you know immediately after you passed the line of that brick house you could see clean down to the bridge?
“A. After you get past that you could,
“Q. And couldn’t you have stopped your car between the time you passed the corner of that building if you had looked to the right and seen the train, couldn’t you have stopped your car before you got on the rail?
“A. Well, I could have stopped about the first track.
“Q. Couldn’t you have done it before you reached the rail? '
“A. That would be har'd' to say. I couldn’t exactly say. It takes about five or six feet to stop in, going even that slow. I was using all the precautions that a man could use.
Page 39.
“Q. Never mind about the flagman attending to his business now, that isn’t what I asked you.- I asked you if you had tried to help the situation by looking you could have seen it. You wouldn’t swear that you couldn’t have stopped it, would you?
“Well, I would have been pretty close before I could have stopped.”

The next witness is J. D. H. Smith, page 44:

“Q. Did you see him when he first raised his flag?
“A. I did.
“Q. Where w'as Mr. Cockraft when he first raised his flag?
“A. He was right near the crossing, very close, when he raised his flag — when he raisd his flag I immediately made an effort to stop, which I did, and Mr. Cock-raft stopped too, about the first rail — the fact of the business is we both stopped very suddenly, but he stopped right on the crossing and the front part of his car looked as though it was on the crossing when he stopped. Of course, I couldn’t see how much, but from the distance I was it looked like he was right on the crossing.
Page 45.
“Q. You say you were watching this flagman?
“A. I was, yes, sir.
“Q. Are you sure Mr. Cockraft stopped immediately when that flag w'as raised?
“A. Yes, sir, because I had to stop behind him and I was going to take care of myself and 1 was watching his car.”

The next witness is H. H. Lee, page 53:

, “Q. You were in Market street?
“A. Yes, sir.
“Q. Coming toward the crossing?
“A. Yes, sir, going to town.
“Q. Traveling'in the same direction Mr. Cockraft was traveling?
“A. Yes, sir.
.“Q. Did you see the flagman of the Y. S. & P. Railroad at that time?
“A. Yes, sir.
Page 54.
“Q. Did you see that flagman before this accident occurred?
“A. Yes, for some time. When I drove down — it all happened just about the same time,. you know, about the time I see the flagman this car was going, in and the train coming in there and all about the same time, and a fellow didn’t, have much timé to see very much.
“Q. When you first saw the flagman did he have his stop sign up or down?
“A. Well, he had it up when I first saw it.' When the signal was thrown up the [686]*686train was heading into him, that is all I know about, it.
Page 55.
“Q. You were behind the car of Mr. Cockraft’s ?
“A. Yes, sir.
“Q. Any car between you and the first car or' were you behind him?
“A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 La. App. 684, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cockraft-v-vicksburg-shreveport-pacific-railway-co-lactapp-1925.