Cockerham v. Davis

5 Port. 220
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1837
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Port. 220 (Cockerham v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cockerham v. Davis, 5 Port. 220 (Ala. 1837).

Opinion

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

The Court in this case, decline at this time, to pronounce any decision on the main question which arises, as the Court for the trial of this cause consists of only two members, and a question having been argued which renders any decision on the merits of the case, unnecessary.

The insolvency of John Davis, who commenced the original proceedings, which caused the present bill to be exhibited, as well as the want of assent of Edward Davis to the use of his name, are material facts, which not being admitted by the answers of his co-defendants, must be supported by proof; [222]*222and there being no proof of these allegations, the objection is fatal.

The answer of one co-defendant can not be used against another — therefore, although the fact is fully admitted in the answer of John Davis, his admission cannot prejudice the rights of his co-defendants. — Collier vs Chapman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collier v. Chapman
2 Stew. 163 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1829)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Port. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cockerham-v-davis-ala-1837.