Cockefair v. Cockefair

New York Supreme Court

Cockefair v. Cockefair

7 N.Y.S. 170, 23 Abb. N. Cas. 219

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 N.Y.S. 170 (Cockefair v. Cockefair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cockefair v. Cockefair, 7 N.Y.S. 170, 23 Abb. N. Cas. 219 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

O’Brien, J.

Section 1772 of the Code provides that where a husband fails

to give security, or to make payments required by the terms of a judgment or order, or to pay any sum of money which he is required to pay by an order as prescribed in section 1769 of this act, the court may cause his personal property to be sequestered. Section 1769 provides that final judgment may award costs in favor of or against either party, and an execution may be issued for the collection thereof, as in an ordinary case, or direct the costs to be paid out of any property sequestered, or otherwise in the power of the. court. Section 1773¹ determines when and under what circumstances default in paying money as required by a judgment or order can be enforced by punishment for contempt. The note of the codifiers, as it appears in Throop’s Code, states that this section is new, and was added for the purpose of settling the question whether non-payment of costs or alimony in an action for divorce can be punished as a contempt. In the absence of any authority brought to my notice holding to the contrary, I am inclined, from a reading of the sections quoted, to conclude that in a proper case, where costs are awarded and directed to be paid by a judgment, they can be enforced by proceedings to punish for contempt; but, upon such a proceeding, either to pay money for maintenance or education of the children, or for the support of the wife, or for costs directed to be paid by a judgment, section 1773 requires that it must appear presumptively to the satisfaction of the court that payment cannot be enforced by means of resorting to any security given, or by sequestration proceedings, or by issuing an execution. Ho affidavit having [171]*171been furnished upon this application from which it is made to appear that payment cannot be enforced by the means enumerated, the motion, for that reason, must be denied; but without costs, and with leave to renew on proper papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’Brien, J.

Section 1772 of the Code provides that where a husband fails

to give security, or to make payments required by the terms of a judgment or order, or to pay any sum of money which he is required to pay by an order as prescribed in section 1769 of this act, the court may cause his personal property to be sequestered. Section 1769 provides that final judgment may award costs in favor of or against either party, and an execution may be issued for the collection thereof, as in an ordinary case, or direct the costs to be paid out of any property sequestered, or otherwise in the power of the. court. Section 1773¹ determines when and under what circumstances default in paying money as required by a judgment or order can be enforced by punishment for contempt. The note of the codifiers, as it appears in Throop’s Code, states that this section is new, and was added for the purpose of settling the question whether non-payment of costs or alimony in an action for divorce can be punished as a contempt. In the absence of any authority brought to my notice holding to the contrary, I am inclined, from a reading of the sections quoted, to conclude that in a proper case, where costs are awarded and directed to be paid by a judgment, they can be enforced by proceedings to punish for contempt; but, upon such a proceeding, either to pay money for maintenance or education of the children, or for the support of the wife, or for costs directed to be paid by a judgment, section 1773 requires that it must appear presumptively to the satisfaction of the court that payment cannot be enforced by means of resorting to any security given, or by sequestration proceedings, or by issuing an execution. Ho affidavit having [171]*171been furnished upon this application from which it is made to appear that payment cannot be enforced by the means enumerated, the motion, for that reason, must be denied; but without costs, and with leave to renew on proper papers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.Y.S. 170, 23 Abb. N. Cas. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cockefair-v-cockefair-nysupct-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack