Cocke v. Upshaw

Supreme Court of Virginia

Cocke v. Upshaw

6 Va. 464

DecidedJanuary 18, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Va. 464 (Cocke v. Upshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cocke v. Upshaw, 6 Va. 464 (Va. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

The following was this Court’s Opinion.

The Court,

doubting, upon the testimony, whether it is not proved in the cause that the intestate Burnett was a secret partner with the appellee Upshaw at the time of the transaction in question, is of opinion that the Decree is erroneous, in dismissing the hill, instead of causing this fact to be decided by an issue directed for that purpose. The Decree is therefore reversed with costs, and the cause remanded to be proceeded in pursuant to the principle;; of ibis decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following was this Court’s Opinion.

The Court,

doubting, upon the testimony, whether it is not proved in the cause that the intestate Burnett was a secret partner with the appellee Upshaw at the time of the transaction in question, is of opinion that the Decree is erroneous, in dismissing the hill, instead of causing this fact to be decided by an issue directed for that purpose. The Decree is therefore reversed with costs, and the cause remanded to be proceeded in pursuant to the principle;; of ibis decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Va. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cocke-v-upshaw-va-1820.