Cockburn v. District of Columbia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WADE R. COCKBURN, Plaintiff, ORDER 21 Misc. 210 (ER) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants.
RAMoOs, D.J.:
On March 2, 2021, Wade R. Cockburn, pro se, brought this action against the District of Columbia, et al. Doc. 1. Plaintiff’s complaint does not fall into any of the listed categories of miscellaneous matters. Accordingly, the Clerk is respectfully directed to open this case as a new unassigned civil action. The Clerk is further directed to terminate any motions and administratively close the miscellaneous case.
It is SO ORDERED.
. 1 oy j Pads Aon 2001 FAY EDGARDORAMOS,U.S.DJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cockburn v. District of Columbia (Cockburn v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.