Cock v. Fellows
1 Johns. 143
Opinion
The word bearer has reference to Thompson as the payee, and as the promise is expressly to pay to him or order, another person could not maintain an action on the note without his indorsement. The judgment below must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cock v. Fellows, 1 Johns. 143 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).
1 Johns. 143 (Cock v. Fellows) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carnright v. Gray
11 N.Y.S. 278 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Tucker v. Tucker
119 Mass. 79 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1875)