Cocilova v. City of Rochester
103 A.D.2d 1007, 478 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19686
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 1984·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff (see CPLR 203, subd [e]; Bilhorn v Farlow, 60 AD2d 755; Cerrato v Crown Co., 58 AD2d 721; cf. Martin v Edward Labs. 60 NY2d 417, 429). (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cocilova v. City of Rochester, 103 A.D.2d 1007, 478 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
103 A.D.2d 1007 (Cocilova v. City of Rochester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Erdos v. New York State Department of Education
105 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Rores v. Passidomo
104 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)