Cochrane v. State
30 Ohio St. (N.S.) 61
Opinion
Where, in a criminal prosecution, and on the defendant’s application, the ease is continued to the next term of the court for trial, at his costs, for which a judgment was rendered and execution ordered, the record should show that the prosecution was ended before a writ of error will lie to reverse such judgment before a final determination of the case. Upon trial the defendant may have been convicted, in which event the statute requires that he pay the costs.
Petition in error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cochrane v. State, 30 Ohio St. (N.S.) 61 (Ohio 1876).
30 Ohio St. (N.S.) 61 (Cochrane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.