Cochrane v. Clough

38 Me. 25
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1854·Published

Opinion

Shepley, C. J.

— No exceptions were taken to the leave granted to amend by erasing two items of the account for intoxicating liquors. .

The amount of the account might be diminished by leave of the Court by the abandonment and erasure of certain items.

It being thus diminished, by allowing the plaintiff to take judgment, there will be no violation of the provisions of the statute declaring, that no action shall be maintained upon any claim or demand in whole or in part for spirituous liquors. Defendant defaulted.

Tenney, Rice, Appleton and Cutting, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cochrane v. Clough, 38 Me. 25 (Me. 1854).

38 Me. 25 (Cochrane v. Clough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.