Cochran v. Warlick

41 S.E. 581, 115 Ga. 399, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 425
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cochran v. Warlick. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 Ga. 396
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 29, 1902·Published

Opinion

Little, J.

1. It does not appeal- that any error was committed in admitting or rejecting evidence, and under the record the evidence warranted the verdict.

2. The ruling made above disposes of all the grounds of the motion for a new trial, the correctness of which was certified by the presiding judge.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cochran v. Warlick, 41 S.E. 581, 115 Ga. 399, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 425 (Ga. 1902).

41 S.E. 581 (Cochran v. Warlick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.