Cochran v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cochran v. Taylor

248 A.D. 669

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Presbyterian Church of Albany v. Cooper, 112 N. Y. 517; Baird v. Baird, 145 id. 659; Hocking Valley R. Co. v. Barbour, 192 App. Div. 654; Strobe v. Netherland Co., 245 id. 573.) All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Thompson, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the authority of Fuller v. Artman (69 Hun, 546). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action by assignee of an option to compel sale of oil property.) Present—Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [156 Misc. 750.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Presbyterian Church of Albany v. Cooper, 112 N. Y. 517; Baird v. Baird, 145 id. 659; Hocking Valley R. Co. v. Barbour, 192 App. Div. 654; Strobe v. Netherland Co., 245 id. 573.) All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Thompson, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the authority of Fuller v. Artman (69 Hun, 546). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action by assignee of an option to compel sale of oil property.) Present—Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [156 Misc. 750.]

Cochran v. Taylor, 248 A.D. 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 669 (Cochran v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related