Cochran v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cochran v. Taylor

248 A.D. 669

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 669 (Cochran v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cochran v. Taylor, 248 A.D. 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Presbyterian Church of Albany v. Cooper, 112 N. Y. 517; Baird v. Baird, 145 id. 659; Hocking Valley R. Co. v. Barbour, 192 App. Div. 654; Strobe v. Netherland Co., 245 id. 573.) All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Thompson, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the authority of Fuller v. Artman (69 Hun, 546). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action by assignee of an option to compel sale of oil property.) Present—Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [156 Misc. 750.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Presbyterian Church of Albany v. Cooper, 112 N. Y. 517; Baird v. Baird, 145 id. 659; Hocking Valley R. Co. v. Barbour, 192 App. Div. 654; Strobe v. Netherland Co., 245 id. 573.) All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Thompson, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the authority of Fuller v. Artman (69 Hun, 546). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action by assignee of an option to compel sale of oil property.) Present—Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [156 Misc. 750.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cochran-v-taylor-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack